Featured Image

Emmerdale fans are usually pretty good at predicting what’s to come -and have predicted a shocking DNA twist for Ruby Fox-Miligan (Beth Cordingly).

Last week, we met Ruby’s ailing mother Helen Fox (Sharon Maughan) when Caleb Milligan (William Ash) visited her.

Caleb Miligan and Ruby Fox-Miligan leaning on a car in Emmerdale

A huge secret could soon be revealed…

It was clear from the outset that the two weren’t on the best of terms – he referred to her as poisonous and revealed to us viewers that she’d tried to Pau him to leave her daughter.

Helen became desperate to reconnect with estranged Ruby, so Caleb used the opportunity to deal her an ultimatum. He wanted £100k, in exchange for a visit.

Unfortunately for him, the plan backfired when the nurse told Ruby that her mum had passed away before she could get there.

Ruby Fox-Miligan smirking at Kim Tate, as she's confronted in Emmerdale
Ruby had missed her mum by 20 minutes (Picture: ITV)

Later, it became clear that Helen really was desperate to see her daughter, having already transferred the money from her death bed. Caleb kept shtum, but it’s left him – and us – wondering what she had to say.

Fans have taken to speculating on social media whether the reason she was so against their marriage was because the two were secretly related – and whether she intended to reveal who Ruby’s real father was.

As we know, Caleb was unveiled as another member of the Tate Dynasty upon his arrival into the village, with his dad being Kim’s (Claire King) ex-husband Frank (Norman Bowler).

The Tates in Emmerdale; Frank, Kim, Chris and Zoe
Could Ruby be a Tate? (Picture: ITV)

One fan took to social media to say: ‘Maybe her father wasn’t her father, maybe it was Frank Tate like Caleb… just a thought.’

This would make her half-siblings with her husband. Yikes.

It’s more likely that the huge secret is related to the Miligans’ daughter Stephanie, who has recently been mentioned.

Will we ever find out what Helen wanted to say? Probably – this is Emmerdale after all, and secrets don’t stay secret for very long!

Emmerdale fans are always on the edge of their seats, trying to predict the next twist and turn in their favorite soap opera. In the latest episode, viewers were introduced to Ruby Fox-Miligan’s ailing mother, Helen Fox. The tension between Helen and Caleb Milligan was palpable, with Caleb demanding a hefty sum of money in exchange for a visit with Ruby.Unfortunately for Caleb, his plan to extort money from Helen backfired when Ruby arrived too late and missed saying goodbye to her mother by just 20 minutes. The revelation that Helen had already transferred the money to see Ruby left both Caleb and viewers wondering about the secrets she held.Speculation has been rife among fans, with some suggesting that Helen’s opposition to Ruby and Caleb’s marriage stemmed from a shocking revelation about Ruby’s true parentage. Could it be possible that Ruby is actually a Tate, making her related to Caleb in a way that none of them could have imagined?One fan theory proposes that Frank Tate, Kim’s ex-husband, could be Ruby’s real father. If this were true, it would make Ruby and Caleb not just husband and wife, but also half-siblings. The implications of such a revelation would undoubtedly send shockwaves through the village.While the focus has been on the potential twist involving Ruby’s parentage, another intriguing storyline involving the Miligans’ daughter, Stephanie, has also been hinted at. Will Helen’s secrets shed light on Stephanie’s past and bring about further turmoil for the family?As Emmerdale is known for its juicy secrets and dramatic reveals, it’s only a matter of time before the truth comes to light. Fans will have to stay tuned to see how the tangled web of relationships in the village continues to unravel. With each episode promising more excitement and intrigue, viewers can expect to be kept on the edge of their seats as the drama unfolds.

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: Los Angeles Times (edited)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!